MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413054238 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105539

Impact of clonal hematopoiesis on cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients of the UK Biobank

2025· article· en· W4413054238 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxine Sun, Lambert Busque, Johanna Sandoval, Louis‐Philippe Lemieux Perreault, Amina Barhdadi, J.‐C. Tardif, Marie‐Pierre Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHazard ratioMedicineInternal medicineOdds ratioOncologyGenotypingCancerProportional hazards modelExomeConfidence intervalMutationGeneticsBiologyExome sequencingGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) and mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) have been linked to increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. CHIP and mCAs may also then contribute to CVD in cancer patients. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of CHIP mutations and mCAs in cancer patients, their co-occurrence, and the associated CVD outcomes across different cancer types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a case-control analysis of CHIP and mCA on the risks of CVD-related outcomes using the UK Biobank. Somatic CHIP mutations were identified from whole-exome sequencing and mCAs from genotyping data among patients diagnosed with cancers. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the associations between CHIP mutations, mCAs, and CVD outcomes, and overall mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 2701 patients (5.5%) harbored CHIP mutations. Increasing age, current smoking, and chemotherapy exposure were associated with higher odds of CHIP mutations and mCAs. Co-occurrence of CHIP and mCAs was observed in 695 patients (25.7% of those with CHIP mutations). Loss of the Y chromosome (LOY) was inversely correlated with CHIP mutations among men [odds ratio (OR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.74, P < 0.001] whereas loss of the X chromosome (LOX) was positively correlated with CHIP mutations among women (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.49, P = 0.03). CHIP mutations were associated with an increased risk of incident CVD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13, P = 0.004] and overall mortality (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.22-1.40, P < 0.001). Notably, there was no synergistic impact of CHIP mutations co-occurring with mCAs (LOY/LOX) on considered outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: CHIP mutations and mCAs are prevalent in cancer patients and are associated with significant increases in cardiovascular risk and mortality, with variations across cancer types. These findings underscore the importance of considering clonal hematopoiesis in the clinical management of cancer patients to mitigate cardiovascular risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationFrench-language works237,207