MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413054838 · doi:10.1111/ocr.70015

Utilising Next‐Generation Sequencing to Explore the Molecular Etiology of Short Root Anomaly

2025· article· en· W4413054838 on OpenAlexaff
Emily A. Joy, David K. Crossman, Mary MacDougall, Quamarul Hassan, Ejvis Lamani

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicdental development and anomalies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchAmerican Association of Orthodontists Foundation
KeywordsSanger sequencingBiologyGeneticsGeneMutationExome sequencingDNA sequencingGene mutationMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Short Root Anomaly (SRA) is a genetic dental disorder affecting tooth root development. The affected teeth have abnormally short roots and significantly reduced root to crown ratios. The aim of this study was to determine the mode of inheritance and the molecular aetiology of SRA in identified Hispanic families. METHODS: Dental history was taken from 5 Hispanic families. SRA diagnosis was based on 1:1.1 C:R ratios. Whole saliva was collected from eight SRA-affected and five unaffected family members with informed consent. DNA was extracted and processed for whole exome sequencing (WES). Gene mutations associated with SRA were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Gene expression in dental cells was examined by qRT PCR, and protein localisation was determined by immunocytochemistry. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was used to confirm gene regulation. RESULTS: SRA exhibited an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in three of the five families examined. The other two families may represent a recessive trait or de novo mutations. WES analysis identified a rare mutation (rs138075877) in the H1C gene of the affected individuals from two of the AD SRA families exhibiting a localised SRA phenotype. We found this gene was differentially expressed in dental mesenchymal and epithelial cells. Finally, ChIP showed that H1C is directly regulated by a root master gene NFIC. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates that a mutation in the H1C gene may have a causal role in AD SRA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthodontics and Craniofacial ResearchSame topicdental development and anomaliesFrench-language works237,207