MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413060851 · doi:10.1002/adom.202500922

Broadband Measurement and Tuning of the Volatile Thermo‐Optic Properties in Chalcogenide Phase Change Materials

2025· article· en· W4413060851 on OpenAlex
Mahirah Zaini, Kwanghyun Kim, Joshua Perkins, Avik Mandal, Abbas Sheikh‐Ansari, Behrad Gholipour

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsMaterials scienceChalcogenideOptoelectronicsPhotonicsBroadbandModulation (music)HeterojunctionDielectricPhase (matter)Layer (electronics)OpticsNanotechnologyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chalcogenide phase change materials (PCM's) are shown to exhibit a much‐overlooked giant switchable volatile thermo‐optic response across the visible/telecommunication bands. The first broadband measurement of this is presented in the alloys: Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 , Sb 2 Te 3 , Sb 2 S 3, and Sb 2 Se 3 , demonstrating that their response can exceed that of many commonly used volatile reconfigurable material platforms. Additionally, it is observed that the thermo‐optic response in some PCM alloys can be uniquely switched from positive to negative sign. To engineer this response based on application requirements, phase change metacoatings are introduced, relying on subwavelength interlayer nanostructuring of the PCM layer interleaved with transparent dielectric barriers. It is demonstrated that their thermo‐optic properties can be suppressed across broad frequency ranges and tuned by varying the periodicity within the metacoating, without altering the composition or stoichiometry of the PCM layer. This shows that neglecting thermo‐optical effects in photonic platforms with PCM inclusions during device design may lead to instabilities and noise due to intrinsic thermo‐optic drifts. It also highlights the potential for exploring new PCMs/PCM heterostructures to serve as the sole modulation layer in PIC architectures, meeting both volatile and nonvolatile signal modulation needs, promising significant reductions in device footprints/power consumption in classical and emerging quantum photonic architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it