MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning Solutions for Knee Osteoarthritis Prediction with Optimized Convolutional Neural Networks

2025· article· en· W4413068380 on OpenAlexaff
M. Selvajothi, Dinesh Kumar Budagam, K. Vijaya Lakshmi, T. V. Geetha, A. Lizy, B. Vanmathi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceOsteoarthritisArtificial neural networkMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A generative in nature joint disorder that is predominantly affects middle-aged and older adults is knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, there are significant obstacles to an objective and effective early diagnosis due to technical bottlenecks including noise, artifacts, and modality. In this study, a comprehensive Deep Learning (DL) approach is presented that Adaptive Wiener Filter (AWF) for preprocessing, Segmentation using K Means Clustering, feature selection using Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM), and Sea Gull Optimization Convolutional Neural Network (SGO-CNN) for Knee KOA prediction. As a result, it will support KOA research as well as draw attention to shortcomings and possible issues with use in clinical practice. The first phase involves Adaptive Wiener Filter. The proposed approach is validated using Python Software with KOA prediction dataset. Performance image, including accuracy, precision, recall and f-score, demonstrates superior’s results in predicting KOA prediction utilizing the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207