MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413074060 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2025.3583215

Insect-Scale Terrestrial Robot Capable of Untethered Environmental Monitoring With Multisensors

2025· article· en· W4413074060 on OpenAlexaff
Baekgyeom Kim, Seongjun Lee, Seokhaeng Huh, Jae-Kwan Ryu, Je‐Sung Koh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsScale (ratio)Environmental scienceRobotEnvironmental monitoringComputer scienceRemote sensingGeologyGeographyArtificial intelligenceCartographyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here, we present a quadruped crawling mechanism to improve the payload capacity for the power and sensing autonomy of the insect-scale terrestrial robot. The robot with 4.2 cm in length is capable of navigation and real-time environmental monitoring using multiple sensors with an onboard battery. The crawling mechanism is designed based on a shape memory alloy (SMA) actuator for a high force-to-weight ratio, kinematic analysis to generate a near-straight foot trajectory, and force analysis considering the target payload (multiple sensors and battery). Furthermore, we fabricate the robot with simple design modifications allowing for improved load-bearing capacity with minimal weight increase (2.5 times the stiffness for a weight increase of 50 mg). With the high-speed actuation of the SMA, the robot is capable of locomotion at speeds up to 7.21 cm/s (1.72 body lengths per second, BL/s) with 0.23 W of average input power and its maximum payload is 20 g (ten times heavier than the body weight). The demonstration shows that the robot can traverse a confined space (height of 4 cm and width of 7 cm) and monitor the environment through multiple sensors (camera, microphone, and ToF), while operating with all functions for 12 min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicModular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207