MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413075569 · doi:10.1016/j.jnrt.2025.100230

Intranasal administration of edaravone attenuates brain injury by targeting neuroinflammation and oxidative stress following intracerebral hemorrhage in mice

2025· article· en· W4413075569 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhe Li, Yang Liu, Ruixue Wei, Sara Xue, V. Wee Yong, Mengzhou Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurorestoratology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersHenan Provincial Science and Technology Research ProjectNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEdaravoneNeuroinflammationOxidative stressNasal administrationIntracerebral hemorrhageMedicinePharmacologyNeuroprotectionAnesthesiaInflammationImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a significant global health burden, characterized by high mortality rates and long-term disability. Despite advancements in stroke management, effective therapeutic strategies targeting secondary brain injury mechanisms post-ICH remain elusive. In this study, we explored the neuroprotective potential of edaravone (EDA) in a mouse model of ICH, with particular focus on the innovative approach of intranasal administration. A total of 96 C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to sham group ( n ​= ​32), ICH ​+ ​vehicle group ( n ​= ​32) and ICH ​+ ​EDA group ( n ​= ​32). ICH was induced using 0.5 ​μL bacterial collagenase VII. EDA (3 ​mg/kg) was administered intranasally starting 2 ​h after ICH and every 12 ​h thereafter (20 ​μL per mouse; 5 ​μL per nostril every 5 ​min). The ICH ​+ ​vehicle group received the identical solvent at an equivalent volume as the EDA group via intranasal administration. We evaluated neurological functions through mNSS, corner turn, and forelimb placement tests. Additionally, brain water content, immunofluorescence staining, western blot analysis, Evans blue extravasation assay, and TUNEL staining were utilized to examine the neuroprotective effects of EDA in ICH. Our findings demonstrate that intranasal delivery of EDA significantly alleviated neurological deficits and reduced brain injury following ICH. This was evidenced by improvements in behavioral assessments, decreased brain water content, reduced lesion volume, and diminished cell death in the perihematomal region. Notably, intranasal EDA administration preserved blood-brain barrier integrity, suppressed microglia/macrophage activation, and mitigated oxidative stress, highlighting its multifaceted neuroprotective mechanisms. These outcomes underscore the therapeutic promise of intranasal administration of EDA as a prospective intervention for alleviating secondary brain injury post-ICH and advocate for further translational and clinical investigations to validate its efficacy and safety in ICH patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurorestoratologySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207