MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413076770 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/07/054

The re-markable 21-cm power spectrum. Part I. Probing the <scp>Hi</scp> distribution in the post-reionization era using marked statistics

2025· article· en· W4413076770 on OpenAlexaff
Mohd Kamran, M Sahlén, Debanjan Sarkar, Suman Majumdar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReionizationPhysicsSpectral densityRedshiftAstrophysicsSmoothingUniverseStatisticField (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Distribution (mathematics)Scale (ratio)Statistical physicsComputational physicsStatisticsQuantum mechanicsGalaxyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The neutral hydrogen ( Hi ) power spectrum, measured from intensity fluctuations in the 21-cm background, offers insights into the large-scale structures (LSS) of our Universe in the post-reionization era (redshift z &lt; 6). A significant amount of Hi is expected to reside in low- and intermediate-density environments, but the power spectrum mainly captures information from high-density regions. To more fully extract the information contained in the Hi field, we investigate the use of a marked power spectrum statistic. Here, the power spectrum is effectively re-weighted using a non-linear mark function which depends on the smoothed local density, such that low- or high-density regions are up- or down-weighted. This approach may also capture information on some higher-order statistical moments of the field. We model the Hi distribution using semi-numerical simulations and for the first time study the marked Hi power spectrum, across 1 ≤ z ≤ 5. Our analysis indicates that there is considerable evolution of the Hi field during the post-reionization era. Over a wide range of length scales (comoving wave numbers 0.05 ≤ k ≤ 1.0 Mpc -1 ) we expectedly find that the Hi evolves slowly at early times, but more rapidly at late times. This evolution is not well-captured by the power spectrum of the standard (unmarked) Hi field. We also study how the evolution of the Hi field depends on the chosen smoothing scale for the mark, and how this affects the marked power spectrum. We conclude that the information about the Hi content at low and intermediate densities is important for a correct and consistent analysis of Hi content and evolution based on the 21-cm background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207