Components of financial mechanism for sustainable development: Theoretical aspect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to substantiate the theoretical foundations of the financial mechanism for ensuring sustainable development of the agricultural sector. The study analysed scientific approaches to the definition of the essence of the financial mechanism in the context of ensuring sustainable development and formulated a new definition as a complex system of financial relations, which is implemented through a set of interrelated elements aimed at achieving balanced economic growth, social justice and environmental safety. The study defined the structure of the financial mechanism, which includes financial methods, levers, instruments, regulatory and information support, and reveals the peculiarities of their application in the agricultural sector, incorporating the specifics. The study established that financial methods form the methodological basis for the functioning of the mechanism, financial levers are the means of implementing the methods, and financial instruments ensure the practical implementation of financial relations. The functions of the financial mechanism (mobilisation, distribution, stimulation, control, stabilisation) were systematised and the specificity in the economic, environmental and social spheres was identified. Based on a comparative analysis of international practices, the study determined that the integration of environmental criteria into Brazil's lending policy reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 10-15% in the agricultural sector, while the Canadian agricultural insurance system reduced the volatility of farm income by 35-40%. The study determined that the Polish Rural Development Programme ensured an increase in the share of organic production from 3.5% to 7.2% in 2015-2020, and in Hungary, more than 12 thousand small farms received access to financing. A system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of the financial mechanism by three dimensions of sustainability was developed for a comprehensive assessment of performance, incorporating all aspects of sustainable development. The importance of the financial mechanism's adaptability to changing environmental conditions, especially in the context of climate change and market fluctuations, was substantiated. The results obtained can be used to develop strategies and financial programmes for sustainable development of the agricultural sector, incorporating regional specifics
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".