MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413079185 · doi:10.37394/232021.2025.5.6

Computer Experimentation with Dirichlet Functions

2025· article· en· W4413079185 on OpenAlexaff
Andrei‐Florin Albişoru, Dorin Ghişa

Bibliographic record

VenueEQUATIONS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHolomorphic and Operator Theory
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirichlet seriesGeneral Dirichlet seriesMathematicsDirichlet L-functionDirichlet eta functionRiemann zeta functionDirichlet kernelDirichlet's energyDirichlet's principleRiemann hypothesisSeries (stratigraphy)Analytic number theoryMathematical analysisEuler's formulaPure mathematicsDirichlet distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a vast amount of literature about Dirichlet series, starting with the works of Cahen and followed by the works of Hardy and Riesz, Valiron, Landau, Bohr, Kojima, etc. These series are generalizations of the famous Euler series. Using his functional equation, Riemann extended the Euler series across the convergence line. The problem of extending general Dirichlet series using Riemann’s method appeared, and it has been successfully dealt with in the particular case of Dirichlet L-series, obtaining functions with properties similar to those of the Riemann Zeta function. However, until recently, no other class of Dirichlet series has been known, that can be continued as a meromorphic function in the whole complex plane. Moreover, the chance that Dirichlet series might exist, such that their continuation has several poles, appeared to be very small. Our discovery of Dirichlet functions generated by Blaschke products by a change of variable completely reversed this point of view. Now, it is known not only that a whole class of Dirichlet series exists with continuations, series that have infinitely many poles but also that they can have some essential singular points. In this paper, the behavior of a Dirichlet function in a neighborhood of an essential singular point is revealed, and the behavior is really surprising. The Dirichlet functions generated by finite Blaschke products are fit for computer experimentation since they are given by formulas that can be implemented with ease in computer programs. In this paper, we are dealing with such Dirichlet functions in a general context and indicate their zeros, poles, and branch points. We are looking for global mapping properties of these functions, describing in detail their fundamental domains. Computer graphics are offered, adding a new chapter to the study of Dirichlet functions, as well as in that of Blaschke products. Computer programs have been created that can deal with infinite Dirichlet series and with the remarkable properties of Dirichlet functions generated by them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEQUATIONSSame topicHolomorphic and Operator TheoryFrench-language works237,207