MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413081254 · doi:10.1136/jnis-2025-snis.416

LB-010 Six-month follow-up of the world’s first international trial of robotic-assisted cerebral aneurysm embolization using the CorPath GRX system

2025· article· W4413081254 on OpenAlexaff
V Pereira, Nataly Cancelliere, Nilian Carla Souza, Hon‐Man Liu, Henry E. Rice, Laetitia de Villiers, Nader Sourour, Frédéric Clarençon, J Spears, A Tomasello, Domingo Hernández, P Nicholson, Vincent Costalat, Grégory Gascou, P Mordasini, J Gralla, Mario Martínez‐Galdámez, Jorge Galván Fernández, Monika Killer‐Oberpfalzer, David S Liebeskind, R Turner, R. Blanc, Michel Piotin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbolizationAneurysmMedicineRadiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background This presentation will highlight the six-month follow-up results of the world’s first prospective, multicenter international trial investigating robotic-assisted endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms using the CorPath GRX system. This pioneering study evaluates the safety, technical performance, and clinical feasibility of robotic neurointervention in real-world practice. Methods Conducted across 10 high-volume neurointerventional centers in seven countries, the trial enrolled patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated with coiling or stent-assisted coiling using robotic-assisted techniques. An independent committee assessed clinical and angiographic outcomes at six months using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). All adverse events were documented. Results A total of 117 patients were enrolled. We will present the impressive early follow-up results of this landmark trial, demonstrating the clinical potential and procedural advantages of robotic neurointervention. Key findings will include clinical and angiographic outcomes, safety observations, and technical considerations relevant to real-world practice. Conclusion This study represents a significant advancement in neuroendovascular care, highlighting the expanding role of robotics in improving procedural precision and consistency. The data to be presented support the continued integration of robotic technologies in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and inform the path toward broader clinical adoption. Disclosures V. Pereira: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. N. Cancelliere: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. N. Souza: None. E. Liu: None. H. Rice: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. L. De Villiers: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. N. Sourour: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. F. Clarencon: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. J. Spears: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. A. Tomasello: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. D. Hernandez: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. P. Nicholson: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. V. Costalat: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. G. Gascou: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. P. Mordasini: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. J. Gralla: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. M. Martínez-Galdámez: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. M. Martínez-Galdámez: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. J. Galvan Fernandez: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. M. Killer-Oberpfalzer: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. D. Liebeskind: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. D. Liebeskind: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. R. Turner: 5; C; Siemens/Corindus. R. Blanc: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus. M. Piotin: 2; C; Siemens/Corindus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→