Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay reflects on the experience of undoing NAVSA in Seoul for EVENT 2024. Through four vignettes, we, the Seoul Hub organising committee, analyse the unique position of the Seoul Hub, engaging with Victorian studies from an Asian perspective. The first vignette contrasts the experience of Korean scholars at NAVSA 2022 in Bethlehem with the Seoul Hub, highlighting the shift from being perceived as ‘native informants’ to engaging in genuine lateral dialogue. The second vignette explores how the conference embodied ‘undisciplining’ practices through its connection to the ‘Undisciplining the Victorian Classroom’ digital humanities project. The third vignette examines how emerging Asian scholars are reshaping Victorian studies through their unique positionality and methodological approaches. The final vignette analyses the cross-hub dialogues and the significance of the conference's location in enabling authentic discourse about practising Victorian studies in Asia. In particular, we consider how the hub contributed to the ongoing efforts to ‘undiscipline’ the field and reimagine Victorian studies as scholars outside of Anglophone academia. We also highlight how the Seoul Hub, by virtue of its geographical location, facilitated a genuinely Asia-based dialogue among Victorianists in the transpacific region, fostering discussions that might not have emerged within Western academia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it