Public Welfare Foundation grants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scope:The Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations supports community organizing campaigns aimed at creating systemic change in the economic, social and political structures that affect the lives of those who have been excluded from resources, power and the right to determination.The organization is currently accepting applications for funding under its Fund for a Just Society program, which supports such projects that are less likely to receive conventional funding because of the innovative or challenging nature of the work or the economic and social status of the constituency.Deadline: Sept. 30.Funds: The maximum award is $15,000, but most grants range between $6,000 and $8,000.Eligibility: For this program, grants are made to non-Unitarian Universalist groups in the United States and Canada that use community organizing to bring about systemic change leading to a more just society; mobilize those who have been disenfranchised and excluded from resources, power and the right to self-determination; have an active focused campaign to create systemic change; and have an operating budget of less than $500,000.Areas: Priority is given to active, specific campaigns to create change in the economic, social and political structures that affect people's lives.The program does not fund social services, educational programs or advocacy-only projects.Nor does it make grants for training to individuals that is not connected to a campaign for justice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".