MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413090999 · doi:10.37349/emed.2025.1001345

Updates on controversies surrounding the staging and management of newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography

2025· article· en· W4413090999 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Tai, Patrick Martineau, Kelvin Wong, Evgeny Sadikov, Glenn P. Ollenberger, Kurian Joseph, Edward Yu, Derek Liu, Aoife Jones Thachuthara, Arbind Dubey, Rashmi Koul

Bibliographic record

VenueExploration of Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWestern UniversityRegina General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerRadiation therapyAndrogen deprivation therapyProstatectomyManagement of prostate cancerPositron emission tomographyBrachytherapyGlutamate carboxypeptidase IIExternal beam radiotherapyOncologyRadiologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are controversies surrounding indications for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET) and the subsequent management of localized disease. Conventional imaging is not a necessary prerequisite to PSMA PET, which serves as an equally effective, if not more effective frontline imaging tool. However, research conducted in different countries has shown conflicting results regarding its cost-effectiveness. Following accurate staging using PSMA PET, subsequent management is discussed by our expert team in this review, which incorporates the latest updates: (1) Brief global overview: the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of routine PET, as well as the treatment sequences of neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiotherapy, require further research. (2) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists demonstrate better response rates, lower recurrence rates, and fewer complications compared to agonists. (3) The unfavorable intermediate-risk group may undergo prostatectomy or radiotherapy combined with 4–6 months of ADT. Radiotherapy alone may be considered for patients with co-morbidities, Gleason score 7 (3 + 4), and positive biopsy cores < 50%, provided an escalated radiation dose is applied. (4) Three Prostate Advances in Comparative Evidence (PACE) studies demonstrated that stereotactic radiotherapy, greatly relying on PSMA PET, is as effective as surgery or conventional radiotherapy. (5) Findings from clinical trials indicate that pelvic nodal radiotherapy coverage provides a survival benefit. (6) A brachytherapy boost provides better outcomes compared to external beam boost, eliminating the need for ADT in intermediate-risk cancers and reducing ADT duration to 6 months in high-risk cancers. Even short-term use (4–6 months) of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists can lead to cardiac morbidity. In summary, localized prostate cancer, as identified through the relatively new PSMA PET, can be managed in various ways. This review highlights significant updates on controversial issues relevant to both cancer patients and researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExploration of MedicineSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207