Speciális vonatkozások a bariátriai sebészetben
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is proven to be the most effective treatment for obesity and its associated metabolic diseases. In this review article, we aim to present the current developments and specific aspects of metabolic surgery, based on the scientific literature and the current trends of some high-volume bariatric centers. In North America – as well as in Europe and Hungary –, the most common bariatric procedures are the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the sleeve gastrectomy. A relatively new malabsorptive procedure, the single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass, is also being performed with increasing frequency. This article provides an overview of the long-term outcomes of these surgeries in terms of weight loss and their impact on comorbidities, based on relevant scientific literature from recent years. We also discuss the main factors influencing the choice of surgical technique, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, hiatal hernia, preoperative body mass index, and the severity of associated diseases. Revision options are also addressed. Given the essential role of a multidisciplinary approach in modern bariatric surgery, we briefly touch on endobariatric procedures as well. Considering the severity of obesity in Hungary and the increasing number of bariatric procedures in the country, we believe our article may be of interest to the Hungarian medical community. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(32): 1243–1249.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it