MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413095028 · doi:10.5038/2074-1235.52.1.1568

A 31-year Time Series of At-sea Counts Shows a Non-significant Decline of Marbled Murrelets at Laskeek Bay, Haida Gwaii, 1990–2020

2024· article· en· W4413095028 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vivian Pattison, Douglas F. Bertram, Sonya A. Pastran, Anthony J. Gaston, Rian D. Dickson, Mark C. Drever

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine ornithology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdBayTransectShoreGeographyOceanographyFisheryAbundance (ecology)Threatened speciesPopulationPhysical geographyEcologyBiologyDemographyArchaeologyGeologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Marbled Murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus breeds and overwinters along the coast of British Columbia, Canada, and is listed as Threatened under the Canadian Species at Risk Act. Understanding population trends for this seabird species is important for management and recovery, yet long-term time-series data for Marbled Murrelet abundance are rare. We update trends and annual fluctuations of Marbled Murrelet numbers derived from at-sea counts in Laskeek Bay, Haida Gwaii, on the north coast of British Columbia, 1990–2020. We found a non-significant negative trend (−1.55% per year). Counts varied seasonally and peaked in early June; counts also varied with distance from shore, with the highest numbers occurring within 1 km of shore. Importantly, a change in survey protocol after 1996, which reduced the transect width from 400 m to 100 m, resulted in lower counts, and we found that counts were 2.7 times greater when wider transects were surveyed. Inter-annual fluctuations in counts were high, but we found no significant relationships between bird counts and either large-scale oceanographic cycles or more localized indicators of ocean productivity. Compared to previous analyses of this dataset, which showed strong declines, the absence of a trend in at-sea counts is more in line with trends derived from systematic radar counts conducted within the Haida Gwaii conservation region over a similar period (−2.8% per year). Our study emphasizes the need to investigate fluctuations in at-sea counts more closely to understand what may be driving peaks in at-sea counts, including possible movement of birds between regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine ornithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207