MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413100422 · doi:10.1177/15910199251355296

Modified carotid artery balloon angioplasty technique for challenging tandem occlusions in acute stroke

2025· article· en· W4413100422 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Marangoni, Behzad Taeb, David Volders

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto Western HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngioplastyBalloonStroke (engine)Carotid arteriesAcute strokeCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyTissue plasminogen activator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tandem occlusion in the setting of acute ischemic stroke presents a challenge for endovascular thrombectomy, leading to delayed revascularization with associated poor prognosis and unfavorable outcomes. Simple angioplasty of the carotid stenosis does not always allow the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis. We present a modified carotid angioplasty technique in which the guiding catheter can successfully be advanced through the carotid stenosis. This allows for faster recanalization and treatment of the intracranial occlusion, knowing that longer procedure times lead to worse outcome. During the modified angioplasty technique, the angioplasty balloon is positioned and inflated partially within the distal guiding catheter and partially within the carotid stenosis. This technique creates momentum for the guiding catheter to advance past the stenosis before it recollapses. Similar techniques have been described before to cross carotid stenosis with an aspiration catheter, and using a diagnostic catheter with a 0.035" wire, using the Dotter technique. However, with this technique it is the guide catheter which can be positioned beyond the proximal carotid stenosis, allowing for access to the intracranial circulation to perform as many thrombectomy passes as required. This allows for faster access to the occluded vessel, without the need for initial stenting, reducing the recanalization times in challenging tandem occlusion cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207