MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413103641 · doi:10.1007/s11121-025-01831-w

Perceived Need and Social Relatedness Contribute to Change in Selective Prevention for Mental Illness: a Mixed Methods Study

2025· article· en· W4413103641 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Dorothee Müller, Ida Christine Tholstrup Gjøde, Sofie Heidenheim Christensen, Sophie Jörgensen, Kirstine Fischer, Mala Moszkowicz, Nicoline Hemager, Merete Nordentoft, Geneviève Piché, Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup

Bibliographic record

VenuePrevention Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsCentre Jeunesse de QuebecUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersTrygFondenCopenhagen Graduate School for Nanoscience and NanotechnologySundhedsstyrelsenRegion HovedstadenAase og Ejnar Danielsens FondKøbenhavns Universitet
KeywordsHealth psychologyPsychological interventionMental healthPsychologyIntervention (counseling)Mental illnessQualitative researchClinical psychologyExploratory researchDevelopmental psychologyFocus groupPublic healthMedicinePsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selective preventive interventions aim to reduce mental illness in high-risk populations, yet the reasons why some children benefit while others do not remain unclear. This study explores participants' perceptions of mechanisms contributing to change in a family-based preventive intervention for children of parents with severe mental illness. Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods approach, we conducted an abductive qualitative analysis of focus groups (eight parents, eight children) to identify narratives of mechanisms contributing to change. The qualitative findings informed a subgrouping variable for a quantitative post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of secondary data from the VIA Family trial (N = 110). The qualitative findings indicate that child mental health problems, parents' personal unmet needs from childhood, children's relatedness to peers and family, and contextual family-focused activities contribute to change within selective prevention. Quantitative results indicated that parents motivated by a need for support at baseline exhibited meaningful improvements in the home environment upon enrollment in the experimental preventive intervention compared with families motivated to support science (mean change: 5.07, 95% CI 2.11 to 8.03). However, no significant subgroup differences were observed in changes in children's global functioning between the allocation groups. Parents' perceived need for support facilitated engagement and home improvements, while children's relatedness to peers and family contributed to their intervention experiences. These findings emphasize the importance of motivation and social connections in intervention outcomes, contributing to the growing field of precision prevention. Future research should explore these mechanisms as potential mediators or mechanisms of action for selective prevention. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03497663.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrevention ScienceSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207