MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CCS coupled with CO2 plume geothermal operations: Enhancing CO2 sequestration and reducing risks

2025· article· en· W4413105545 on OpenAlex
Kevin P. Hau, Maren Brehme, Alireza Rangriz Shokri, Reza Malakooti, Erik Nickel, Rick Chalaturnyk, Martin O. Saar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeothermics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
FundersEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichWerner Siemens-StiftungEnergi Simulation
KeywordsGeothermal gradientCarbon sequestrationPlumeEnvironmental scienceEarth scienceGeologyPetroleum engineeringCarbon dioxideChemistryGeophysicsMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition to a low-carbon economy is essential for mitigating climate change, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors. Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (CC U S) is expected to play a pivotal role in this transition. This numerical study integrates CO 2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) systems with conventional CCS using field data from the Aquistore CCS project. By employing an integrated subsurface-surface modelling workflow, we simulate and compare two 30-year scenarios with nearly identical masses of sequestered CO 2 : a) “Business-as-usual” CCS and b) coupled CPG-CCUS The results suggest that coupled CPG-CCUS operations provide a stable source of geothermal energy, which could potentially reduce or offset energy costs, such as those associated with the CO 2 capturing process. Additionally, coupling CPG with CCS enhances CO 2 sequestration efficiency by increasing CO 2 mass density in reservoir regions that become thermally depleted due to the sustained injection of CO 2 at temperatures lower than the native reservoir temperature. Although thermally depleted regions develop during both CCS and CPG-CCUS operations, they are significantly more pronounced during the latter due to the combined effect of both cold CO 2 injection and heat extraction. Moreover, CPG‑CCUS operations result in a more concentrated CO 2 plume around the wells. While the production well induces a pressure gradient, this gradient primarily directs fluid flow along the injection-to-production well axis, effectively focusing the CO 2 plume and limiting widespread lateral diffusion of the fluids (brine and CO 2 ) to the far-field reservoir. This localised CO 2 accumulation improves CO 2 plume control and reduces risks associated with uncontrolled CO 2 migration, thereby enhancing the predictability of CO 2 accumulation. This synergistic combination of CCS and CPG operations offers a pathway for the energy transition, enhancing both the CCS technology and the geothermal resource potential, while improving CO 2 sequestration safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it