Assessment of rhodolith‐forming species diversity in British Columbia uncovers novel cryptic diversity in the genera <i>Boreolithothamnion</i> and <i>Rhodolithia</i> gen. nov. (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta) and the occurrence of hybrid rhodoliths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rhodolith collections in British Columbia have historically been limited, and published regional species diversity data are poor. The acquisition of recent collections, notably from rhodolith beds in Haida Gwaii, provided an opportunity to assess diversity in these waters. The DNA barcode markers COI-5P, rbcL-3P, and psbA were used to identify unique genetic groups, which were then placed into a phylogenetic context with other coralline algae and subsequently observed anatomically. These analyses uncovered six rhodolith-forming species: two known, viz. Boreolithothamnion phymatodeum and Boreolithothamnion soriferum; a species provisionally called Boreolithothamnion sp. 1heterocladum; and three novel species described here, viz. Boreolithothamion astragaloi sp. nov., Boreolithothamnion tanuense sp. nov., and Rhodolithia gracilis gen. et. sp. nov., which comprises three varieties. Of particular interest, sequences of the ITS rDNA region showed the variety Rhodolithia gracilis var. gracilis × ramosa var. nov. to be a hybrid of the other two varieties: Rhodolithia gracilis var. gracilis var. nov. and Rhodolithia gracilis var. ramosa var. nov. Although understanding the full extent of BC rhodolith beds will require additional sampling, these findings indicate that rhodoliths are widespread and diverse in British Columbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".