MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413110732 · doi:10.1111/inr.70081

Fostering International Collaborations to Inform Nursing and Midwifery Policy: A Caribbean Initiative

2025· article· en· W4413110732 on OpenAlexaff
Eileen T. Lake, Adelais Markaki, Oscar Noel Ocho, Tina J. Kavukattu, Denise Bryant‐Lukosius, Jody R. Lori, Dawn Munroe, Susan Walsh, Edwin Vicente C. Bolastig, Bruna Moreno Dias, Vishwanath Partapsingh, Carmen Alvarez, Pauline Anderson‐Johnson, Monique Lynch, Jaime Wynter‐Hewitt

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Nursing Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
FundersPan American Health OrganizationUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsWorkforceRespondentStakeholderStakeholder engagementNursingBusinessPolitical scienceMedicinePublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: This initiative aimed to contribute to the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization's (PAHO/WHO) strategic goals for nursing and midwifery workforce development in the Caribbean by establishing a collaboration to streamline processes to collect comprehensive region-wide data and reduce respondent burden. BACKGROUND: The Caribbean region faces persistent challenges in nursing and midwifery workforce development due to high migration rates, workforce shortages, and limited regional data collection. Seven PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centers (CCs) for Nursing and Midwifery were tasked separately with Terms of Reference to support the human resources for health (HRH)-related Sustainable Development Goals of Caribbean countries. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: PAHO-tasked Terms of Reference for CC activities and strategic priorities in the Caribbean. DISCUSSION: Using Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model, we described the development, implementation, and impact of this initiative. Structural components included the Pan American Collaborating Centers for Nursing and Midwifery (PANMCC) network, formal leadership, PAHO support, team commitment and expertise, and resources. The process emphasized regular communication, stakeholder engagement, and a collaborative approach to survey design and distribution. Outcomes included the successful development and implementation of a comprehensive survey, improved data quality, reduced respondent burden, and shared learning. Unexpected benefits were the strengthening of the PANMCC network and further opportunities for collaboration. CONCLUSION: The success of this initiative was attributed to structures and processes that set the foundation for effective communication, collaboration, and synergies among the CCs to achieve project goals. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING POLICY AND PRACTICE: This international collaboration showcased the importance of strong leadership, mutual commitment, and unwavering support from the PANMCC network. The findings demonstrate the potential of coordinated efforts to inform nursing and midwifery HRH policy and practice in resource-constrained regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Nursing ReviewSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207