MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feasibility analysis of recycling and repurposing end-of-life vehicle batteries in isolated island areas: A case study in British Columbia, Canada

2025· article· en· W4413110845 on OpenAlex
Ziyu Wang, Linxiang Lyu, Guohe Huang, Chunjiang An

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsRepurposingLife-cycle assessmentSustainable managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental economicsReuseSustainabilityEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceBusinessEngineeringWaste managementEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is widely recognized as a pivotal strategy for mitigating climate change. However, the surge in EV usage brings significant challenges regarding the end-of-life management of lithium-ion batteries, particularly in geographically isolated islands, such as Vancouver Island, Canada. This study addresses the urgent need for effective waste management solutions by integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to evaluate six distinct scenarios for managing spent EV batteries. These scenarios encompass pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recycling, on-island and off-island repurposing for secondary applications, and landfilling. A comprehensive assessment of environmental, social, and economic impacts reveals that all management strategies, except landfilling, positively contribute to environmental performance. Among all scenarios, on-island repurposing emerges as the most feasible option across multiple impact categories, including terrestrial ecotoxicity, human health, and abiotic resources. Furthermore, hydrometallurgical recycling shows promise due to its efficiency and lower environmental burden compared to the pyrometallurgical method. The results offer valuable insights into optimizing waste EV battery management systems in island contexts and underscore the potential for innovative approaches. This research provides a framework for policymakers to optimize waste EV battery management systems in island regions, ensuring sustainable practices that align with growing EV markets. • Repurposed second-life batteries offer considerable economic benefits. • Hydrometallurgical recycling performs better than pyrometallurgical methods. • On islands, shorter transport distances and higher recycling rates are optimal. • Landfills are simpler and more achievable but do not ensure long-term sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it