MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413111850 · doi:10.1002/cssc.202500837

Tuning Water Transport through Nanochannels of Robust Cation‐Intercalated Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub><i>x</i></sub> MXene Membranes

2025· article· en· W4413111850 on OpenAlexaff
Vahid Rad, Ahmad Arabi Shamsabadi, Amir Aghaei, Brian C. Wyatt, Farzaneh Jahanbakhshi, Anupma Thakur, Hui Fang, Mohtada Sadrzadeh, Babak Anasori, Andrew M. Rappe, Zahra Fakhraai, Masoud Soroush

Bibliographic record

VenueChemSusChem · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneMaterials scienceWater splittingMXenesCrystallographyChemistryNanotechnologyPhotocatalysisCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ti3C2Tx MXene membranes have attracted considerable interest due to their exceptional water transport properties, yet the role of cation intercalation on governing transport remains poorly understood. In this experimental and theoretical study, it shows how intercalation with K+, Na+, Li+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ modulates both the nanochannel architecture and water flux of Ti3C2Tx membranes. Unlike in graphene oxide analogs, cations with larger hydration diameters in Ti3C2Tx expand the interlayer spacing, widening flow channels, enhancing slip length of these nanochannels, and boosting water flux from 31.45 to 61.86 L m−2 h−1. To overcome intrinsically poor adhesion of Ti3C2Tx to polymeric supports, this study incorporates a thin polyvinyl‐alcohol interlayer, which substantially enhances mechanical robustness and structural integrity. Together, these findings elucidate how cation hydration controls water transport and offer a flexible strategy for tailoring MXene membrane performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemSusChemSame topicMXene and MAX Phase MaterialsFrench-language works237,207