MitoQ Mitigates Radiation‐Induced Testicular Injury: Molecular Docking and Toxicity Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the possible mitigating effect of a mitochondrion-targeted antioxidant (MitoQ) against gamma irradiation-induced testicular damage. The rats were distributed into five groups. The first group served as a control, the second group received MitoQ (2 mg/kg/day; i.p.) for 7 days, the third group was exposed to gamma radiation (5 gray as a single dose), the fourth group received MitoQ prophylactically before irradiation, and the last group was exposed to gamma radiation and then treated with MitoQ. The rats were killed 7 days after irradiation. MitoQ replenished mitochondrial ROS, indicating its antioxidant effect. MitoQ inhibited the intrinsic apoptosis cascade via a reduction in Bax and alleviated Bcl-2. MitoQ improved steroidogenesis, as verified by an increase in testosterone and upregulation of 3β-HSD and 17β-HSD expression, in addition to increasing complex I and succinate dehydrogenase activity. Likewise, sperm evaluation corroborated these findings. The acute toxicity profile of MitoQ was investigated in mice and was found to be 75 mg/kg body weight. Additionally, a molecular docking study of MitoQ showed a good fit to the active site of succinate dehydrogenase. In conclusion, this study introduces MitoQ as a new approach for the management of testicular damage triggered by gamma irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".