Impact of device-assisted circumcision on sexual quality of life in adult males: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Device-assisted circumcision has emerged as an alternative to traditional surgical methods, offering improved safety, efficiency, and cosmetic outcomes. While its clinical benefits are documented, on analyzing the literature, no comprehensive synthesis of the impact of device-assisted circumcision on sexual quality of life in adult men, including erectile function, ejaculation control, and overall satisfaction, has been found. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the present literature regarding the effects of device-assisted circumcision on sexual quality of life among adult male populations. METHODS: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was conducted. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, EBSCO HOST, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to December 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed prospective and retrospective clinical trials, cohort, cross-sectional, or case control, enrolling male patients ≥ 18 years old, regardless of ethnicity, marital status, and country of origin, who underwent device-assisted circumcision. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool were utilized for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Literature searches identified 1643 records; 8 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 965 patients available for analysis. This cohort included 965 individuals circumcised using circumcision devices (PrePex [336]; ShangRing [297]; Alisklamp [267]; a novel disposable circumcision stitching instrument [51], and the adult circumcision template [14]). The mean age of participants ranged between 21.2 and 34.2 years. The circumcision devices either positively influence or maintain sexual satisfaction and functioning in males. Furthermore, the circumcision procedure has minimal adverse effects on erectile function, with some evidence suggesting potential improvement in the long term. Conflicting results were observed regarding sexual satisfaction and prolonged intercourse, with some studies reporting increased satisfaction and extended intercourse duration, while others found no significant changes in these aspects. CONCLUSION: The device-assisted circumcision demonstrates a positive influence on or maintains sexual quality of life in adult males, resulting in enhancements in erection quality, ejaculation control, duration of intercourse, and overall male satisfaction. The findings support its viability as a safe and efficacious alternative to traditional methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".