MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413116701 · doi:10.1136/pn-2025-004724

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis precipitated by lamotrigine

2025· article· en· W4413116701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePractical Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersUCLH Biomedical Research Centre
KeywordsLamotrigineMedicinePsychiatryEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare and life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome of uncontrolled systemic inflammation. In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning of the risk of HLH after starting lamotrigine. Early recognition and prompt and effective immunosuppression, alongside trigger identification, are essential for a good outcome in HLH. We report two cases of HLH temporally associated with lamotrigine initiation. Both patients had presented with refractory fever, falling cell counts and hyperferritinaemia-the hallmark 3Fs of HLH-and were admitted to critical care with multiorgan failure within 10 days of starting lamotrigine. They received treatment for HLH with intravenous corticosteroids, immunoglobulin and anakinra; lamotrigine was withdrawn. Both patients recovered fully following protracted hospital admissions and remain stable on alternative antiseizure medication. HLH is a very rare but life-threatening complication of lamotrigine therapy. Appropriate consent and clinical vigilance are relevant to clinicians using lamotrigine in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it