Polymerization and flanking domains of the bactofilin BacA collectively regulate stalk formation in Asticcacaulis biprosthecum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bactofilins are a recently discovered class of cytoskeletal protein, widely implicated in subcellular organization and morphogenesis in bacteria and archaea. Several lines of evidence suggest that bactofilins polymerize into filaments using a central β-helical core domain, flanked by variable N- and C- terminal domains that may be important for scaffolding and other functions. In Asticcacaulis biprosthecum, the bactofilin BacA serves as a topological organizer of stalk synthesis, localizing to the stalk base and coordinating the synthesis of these long, thin extensions of the cell envelope. The easily distinguishable phenotypes of wild-type A. biprosthecum stalks and ΔbacA "pseudostalks" make this an ideal system for investigating how mutations in BacA affect its functions in morphogenesis. Here, we redefine the core domain of A. biprosthecum BacA using various bioinformatics and biochemical approaches to precisely delimit the N- and C- terminal domains. We then show that loss of these terminal domains leads to cells with severe morphological abnormalities, typically presenting a pseudostalk phenotype. BacA mutants lacking the N- and C- terminal domains also exhibit localization defects, implying that the terminal domains of BacA may be involved in its subcellular positioning, possibly through regulatory interactions with membrane-associated factors or other morphological proteins. We further show that point mutations that render BacA defective for polymerization lead to stalk synthesis defects. Overall, our study suggests that BacA's polymerization capacity and domain-mediated cellular positioning play a crucial role in the protein's function as a morphogenic regulator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".