MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413121348 · doi:10.37349/eemd.2025.101439

Taste genomics and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic qualitative meta-synthesis

2025· article· en· W4413121348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vishnu Shivam

Bibliographic record

VenueExploration of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisGenomicsTasteType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusMedicineSystematic reviewMEDLINEInternal medicineBiologyFood scienceGeneticsEndocrinologyGenomeGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that genetic variations in taste receptor genes may influence dietary behaviors, energy homeostasis, and metabolic risk, contributing to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) pathogenesis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in taste receptor genes and T2DM. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42022351880). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through June 2025. Original studies examining SNPs in taste receptor genes among individuals with T2DM were included. Quality assessment was performed independently by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Sixteen studies involving diverse populations met the inclusion criteria. Significant associations with T2DM were observed for SNPs in type 2 taste receptor gene family R member 3 (TAS2R3; rs11763979), TAS2R4 (rs2233998), TAS2R7, TAS2R9, TAS2R38, TAS2R50, cluster determinant 36 (CD36; rs1761667, rs3211956, rs7755), carbonic anhydrase VI gene (CA6; rs2274327), transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1; rs161364, rs8065080), transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M gene member 5 (TRPM5; rs4929982), and TRPM8 (rs12472151). These polymorphisms may alter taste perception and gut hormone responses [e.g., glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)], affecting dietary intake, satiety, insulin secretion, and glucose regulation. Discussion: The findings suggest that genetic variations in taste receptor genes may contribute to T2DM through behavioral and metabolic mechanisms. Incorporating gustatory phenotyping with genotypic profiling could enable personalized dietary strategies and inform novel therapeutic approaches targeting taste-mediated gut signaling. Further large-scale, multi-ethnic, and mechanistic studies are warranted to confirm these associations and elucidate their clinical implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExploration of Endocrine and Metabolic DiseasesSame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207