Mineralogical, Petrological, 3D Modeling Study and Geostatistical Mineral Resources Estimation of the Zone C Gold Prospect, Kofi (Mali)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3D model integrating mineralogical, petrological, and geostatistical resource estimation was developed for Zone C of the Kofi Birimian gold deposit in Western Mali. Petrographic analysis identified two forms of gold mineralization: (i) native gold or electrum inclusions within pyrite, and (ii) disseminated native gold along pyrite fractures. Four types of hydrothermal alteration–epidotization, chloritization, carbonatization, and albitization were observed microscopically. Statistical analysis of geochemical data classified five lithologies: mafic dyke, felsic dyke, diabase, faulted breccia, and intermediate quartz diorite. Minerals identified petrographically were corroborated by multivariate correlations among elements (Cr, Fe, Ni, Al, Ti, Na, and Ca), as revealed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). A 3D borehole-based model revealed spatial correlations between hydrothermal alteration zones and associated geochemical anomalies, notably tourmalinization (B) and albitization (Na), with the latter serving as a key indicator for new exploration targets. The spatial associations of anomalous Ag, B, Hg, As, and Na commonly linked to tourmalinization suggest favorable zones for gold and silver mineralization. Geostatistical analysis identified isotropic continuous mineralized structures for most elements, including gold. Spherical isotropic variograms with ranges from 35 to 75 m were fitted for in situ resource estimation (e.g., silver ≈ 40 m; gold ≈ 60 m). The resulting estimated resources (indicated + inferred), based on a 1.0 g/t Au cut-off, are 2.476 Mt at 3.5 g/t Au indicated (0.278 Moz or 8.67 t), and 1.254 Mt at 2.78 g/t Au inferred (0.112 Moz or 3.49 t). This study provides a framework for identifying new mineralized zones, and the multidisciplinary approach demonstrates the connections between mineralogy and the information embedded in geochemical datasets, which are revealed through appropriate tools and an understanding of the underlying processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".