MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413128161 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-bcs.57

2-018 Sex-based discrepancies in outcomes of non-revascularized NSTEMI patients with complete AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation

2025· article· en· W4413128161 on OpenAlexaff
Parampreet Johal, Nomesh Kumar, Gabriel Imbianozor, HARJEEVAN KALRA, ANERI SANEPARA, Neel Patel, Dhaval Patel, Piyush Puri, Rutvi Amin, Fathima Shehnaz Ayoobkhan, Vivek Mittal, Nana Afua Afrakuma Kyeremateng, Hemamalini Sakthivel, Kamleshun Ramphul, Raheel Ahmed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePermanent pacemakerCardiologyBlock (permutation group theory)Internal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Complete atrioventricular block is a rare, yet important complication that can be seen in some cases of NSTEMI, leading to multiple nefarious complications. Such patients often require permanent pacemaker(PPM) implantations and there is limited data on whether the outcomes are modified by the sex of the patients. We aim to study any sex-based differences in outcomes among non-revascularized NSTEMI patients who underwent PPM implantations after experiencing complete atrioventricular block. Methods NSTEMI patients who did not undergo CABG or PCI and experienced complete AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation were studied using the 2016–2021 National Inpatient Sample. We excluded cases with prior PPM implants and younger than 18 years. Multivariable regression analyzes were derived to estimate differences in outcomes between Males and Females. Results We evaluated 1935 cases that matched our selection criteria, consisting of 990(51.2%) Males and 945(48.8%) Females. Males were younger (median age 77.0 vs. 79.0, p<0.01), with no differences in median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores(4.0vs. 4.0, p=0.062) or time from admission to procedure(3.0 vs. 3.0 days, p=0.481). Males expressed higher odds of sepsis(aOR 2.173 95% CI 1.336–3.535 p 0.002), need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation(aOR 3.25 95% CI 1.826–5.785 p <0.001), acute kidney injury(aOR 3.715 95% CI 1.203–11.474 p 0.023 ) requiring hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation(aOR 1.65 95% CI 1.185–2.297 p 0.003), than females. Although their median lengths of stay (6.0 vs. 7.0 days, p=0.249), hospital charges ($113762 vs. $118430, p=0.062), odds of acute ischemic strokes(aOR 1.127 95% CI 0.7–1.815 p 0.623), cardiogenic shock(aOR 0.806 95% CI 0.585–1.11 p 0.187), and need for vasopressors(aOR 1.198 95% CI 0.667–2.153 p 0.546) did not differ, males were more likely to die(aOR 1.757 95% CI 1.048–2.947 p 0.033)(table 1). Conclusion Males undergoing PPM implantation following complete AV block in NSTEMI events are associated with several poorer outcomes than females. This highlights the need for proper pre-operative risk stratification and the need to address post-operative complications promptly for optimal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies→French-language works237,207→