MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413138420 · doi:10.1097/olq.0000000000002199

Prevalence, Treatment, and Follow-Up for Lymphogranuloma Venereum Serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men Attending Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in Alberta, Canada, 2018 to 2022

2025· article· en· W4413138420 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Gratrix, Sabrina S. Plitt, John Niruban, Jennifer Karwacki, Emily McCullough, Caley Shukalek, Ángel Chú, Suzanne Gibbons, Alberto Severini, Petra Smyczek

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphogranuloma venereumMedicineMen who have sex with menChlamydia trachomatisChlamydiaDoxycyclineInternal medicineAzithromycinOutbreakGynecologySyphilisVirologyAntibioticsImmunologyMicrobiologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) have been reported among gay, bisexual, and men who have sex with other men (gbMSM) in Europe and North America. In Alberta, Canada, a universal surveillance program was initiated to assess LGV rates among gbMSM seen at provincial sexually transmitted infection clinics. Our study examines the epidemiological characteristics and treatment of cases. METHODS: We describe a prospective, multicenter LGV surveillance program using chlamydia-positive nucleic acid amplification test specimens from gbMSM collected at 3 sexually transmitted infection clinics between April 2018 and July 2022. Chlamydia-positive specimens from rectal, pharyngeal, and urine specimens were sent for LGV typing. Treatment and test of cure for LGV-confirmed cases were followed. Demographic variables were compared between LGV-positive and LGV-negative specimens using χ2 tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (n = 2333) of all chlamydia-positive specimens were tested for LGV, and 45 (1.9%; 95% confidence interval, 1.4%-2.5%) specimens were confirmed to be LGV. A majority (n = 1374) of specimens submitted for LGV testing were rectal swabs, of which 37 (2.7%) were positive. One-half (51.2% [22 of 43]) of cases were asymptomatic. Of the 22 cases with a negative test-of-cure result, 9 (40.9%) patients received doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 21 days, 7 (31.8%) patients received azithromycin 1 g as a single dose, 5 (22.7%) patients received doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 7 days, and 1 patient (4.6%) was treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: Universal testing increased the detection of LGV among asymptomatic patients. Future research should consider the impact of asymptomatic LGV in transmission networks and the role of alternate, shorter treatment regimens than the recommended 21 days of doxycycline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted DiseasesSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207