MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413138586 · doi:10.62347/ztpj8215

Study on sedentary behavior and its influencing factors in elderly ovarian cancer patients during home confinement

2025· article· en· W4413138586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saie Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGentZhejiang University
KeywordsCHAIDLogistic regressionMedicineDiseaseSocial supportGerontologyScale (ratio)Marital statusOrdered logitPopulationPhysical therapyDecision treeInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sedentary behavior is prevalent among the elderly and has become an increasingly serious public health issue. Although extensive research has been conducted on the status and risk factors of sedentary behavior in the general elderly population, the current situation and related influencing factors of sedentary behavior in elderly patients with ovarian cancer, a disease-specific group, have not been fully explored. In this study, a total of 206 elderly ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from September 1, 2022, to February 28, 2025, were selected as the research subjects by convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire, Chinese Adult Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. The influencing factors of sedentary behavior in EOC patients were analyzed by the logistic regression model and CHAID decision tree model. Among the 206 EOC patients, the average sedentary time was 7.4±3.0 h/d, and 161 patients (78.2%) had sedentary behavior (sedentary time ≥5 h/d). Logistic regression analysis and CHAID decision tree algorithm both demonstrated that social support and cancer symptom burden were the influencing factors of sedentary behavior in EOC patients (P<0.05). Moreover, the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) algorithm further revealed an interaction between the two factors, indicating that the social support level was the most crucial determinant. Our study reveals that sedentary behavior among EOC patients is alarmingly prevalent, necessitating urgent attention from medical professionals. Given the significant impact of social support and cancer symptom burden on this sedentary behavior, healthcare providers should proactively assess and intervene to address these influential factors, thereby mitigating the adverse consequences of excessive sedentary time for EOC patients. Decision tree and logistic regression models effectively identify sedentary behavior determinants with good predictive power. A combined approach is recommended to leverage their complementary strengths, providing a robust basis for reducing sedentary behavior in EOC patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Cancer ResearchSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207