MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413139878 · doi:10.1542/hpeds.2024-008293

Intermittent vs Continuous Pulse Oximetry for Bronchiolitis Hospitalizations: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4413139878 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Salada, Kate Saylor, Sanjay Mahant

Bibliographic record

VenueHospital Pediatrics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulse oximetryBronchiolitisCINAHLRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEEmergency medicinePsychological interventionIntensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicineAnesthesiaRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: The decision to use pulse oximetry continuously or intermittently for patients admitted to the hospital with bronchiolitis varies among providers and institutions. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intermittent vs continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until December 13, 2024. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of children younger than 2 years admitted with bronchiolitis that reported outcomes of continuous and intermittent pulse oximetry were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility. Study characteristics, study quality, and outcomes were extracted from each article. Studies were heterogeneous in design; therefore, a synthesis without meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Of 2299 citations identified, 187 were reviewed in full text, and 11 studies included. Two multicenter randomized control trials (RCTs) (n = 390) found that intermittent monitoring had similar length of stay (LOS) and supplemental oxygen duration, without increased intensive care unit transfer rates. One economic evaluation found similar health care and societal costs between monitoring strategies. One cohort study found increased alarm burden with continuous monitoring. Cross-sectional studies reported that continuous monitors were helpful and provided security to parents but were associated with increased parental anxiety and fatigue. Quality improvement studies of bundled interventions found reduced or similar LOS with intermittent monitoring, with no change in readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on RCTs, intermittent and continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis have similar outcomes of LOS, supplemental oxygen duration, safety, and cost-effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.009
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHospital PediatricsSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207