MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413142560 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaf221

Financial difficulty among patients with cancer participating in clinical trials and its association with patient survival and quality of life

2025· article· en· W4413142560 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nan Chen, Dongsheng Tu, Joseph L. Pater

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Clinical trialQuality of life (healthcare)Quality (philosophy)MedicineCancer survivalCancerFinancePsychologyInternal medicineBusinessNursingPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The incidence and worsening of financial difficulty among patients with cancer participating in clinical trials and their relationship with mortality, quality of life, and toxicity outcomes have been understudied. The objective of this study was to understand the incidence of financial difficulty among Canadian patients participating in systemic therapy trials at baseline and after trial participation and to assess the relationship between financial difficulty and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients participating in 14 systemic therapy trials conducted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group for adult patients with advanced cancer. Incidence of financial toxicity at baseline and after trial participation were measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ Core Questionnaire. The association of financial difficulty with trial characteristics and patient outcomes (mortality, quality of life, and toxicity) was studied. RESULTS: Overall, 2766 patients from 14 trials were included, of whom 37% had financial difficulty at baseline and 25% experienced worsening of financial difficulty after trial enrollment compared with their baseline status. Baseline financial difficulty but not the worsening of financial difficulty was associated with worse mortality outcomes. Worsening of financial difficulty was, however, associated with poor global quality of life outcomes and increased odds of clinical toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the setting of a public health system in Canada, one-third of patients experience financial difficulty, with one-quarter of them experiencing worsening of financial difficulty with trial participation, and both were related to worse patient outcomes. Targeted policy-level interventions are needed to understand and address the cause of financial difficulty in patients with cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrench-language works237,207