MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413143847 · doi:10.1016/j.still.2025.106797

Predicting soil hydraulic conductivity using stacked deep neural networks: Long-term tillage impacts on a Vertisol in the Eastern Mediterranean

2025· article· en· W4413143847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
İsmail Çelik, Ömer Faruk Kahraman, Miraç Kılıç, Hikmet Günal

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil and Tillage Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsVertisolMediterranean climateHydraulic conductivityTillageTerm (time)Environmental scienceSoil scienceGeologyAgronomySoil waterEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate prediction of soil hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is crucial for understanding water movement and improving soil management, particularly under diverse tillage systems. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a Stacked Deep Neural Network (Stacked DNN) model for predicting Ks using easily measurable soil physical and hydro physical properties under long term tillage practices. Soil samples were collected from 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths across conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), reduced tillage (RT), and strategic tillage (ST). The Ks values at 15 cm depth were measured using a Guelph permeameter at 5 cm and 10 cm water heads, ranged from 0.024 to 1.101 cm/h for the 0–10 cm soil depth. The average values from these measurements were used for model training and validation. Predicted Ks values for 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths varied significantly among tillage systems and depths, reflecting the effects of soil management on hydraulic behavior. Conventional tillage with residue burning (CT2) recorded the highest predicted Ks at 0.339 cm h −1 (0–15 cm) and 0.091 cm h −1 (15–30 cm). In contrast, no-tillage (NT) exhibited the lowest values, averaging 0.081 cm h −1 and 0.128 cm h −1 at respective depths, likely due to surface compaction. Reduced tillage (RT2) demonstrated balanced performance, with predicted values of 0.484 cm h −1 (0–15 cm) and 0.186 cm h −1 (15–30 cm), suggesting enhanced water infiltration compared to other reduced tillage methods. The Stacked DNN model achieved superior predictive accuracy, with an R² of 0.986 and an RMSE of 0.029 cm h −1 , outperforming individual machine learning models such as Random Forest (R² = 0.902) and XGBoost (R² = 0.917). Bulk density, macroporosity, and mean weight diameter were identified as critical variables influencing Ks predictions, highlighting the model’s ability to capture complex nonlinear relationships. These findings emphasize the effectiveness of ensemble machine learning approaches in modeling Ks and the significant influence of tillage practices on soil hydraulic properties. Moreover, the ability to accurately predict Ks has substantial practical implications for sustainable agriculture, as it enables the optimization of irrigation practices, informed soil management, and improved water resource conservation to support long-term crop productivity and environmental stewardship. • Stacked_DNN model accurately predicted hydraulic conductivity under varying tillage. • Stacked models outperform RF and XGBoost in predicting soil Ks values. • Hydraulic conductivity predictions showed strong agreement with field values. • No-tillage resulted in the lowest predicted Ks, indicating reduced soil permeability. • Ensemble ML models reveal key soil variables influencing Ks predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil and Tillage ResearchSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207