MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Object Detection and Hazard Alert System for Child Safety on Robot using YOLO

2025· article· en· W4413146664 on OpenAlexaff
K Sivakrishna, J. Vaishnavi, Annapureddy Sreelekha, S. Sindhu, Chappidi Varshitha, Gowrisankar Kalakoti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHazardRobotObject (grammar)Object detectionComputer visionArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project outlines about Object Detection and Hazard Alert System for Child Safety on Robots Using YOLO. This invention integrated the YOLO (You Only Look Once) which helps in real time object detection ensuring child safety. By detecting the hazards and sending notification alerts, the system significantly reduced the hazardous situations providing safety to the children. The system is integrated with advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques for object detection that increases the accuracy and flexibility in automated systems and dynamic environments. This innovation ensures child safety, by enabling secured communication between the system and parents. Object Detection and Hazard Alert System for Child Safety Using YOLO is an application designed to ensure the child safety at home by continuously monitoring and detecting hazardous objects present near the child in real-time. The system is integrated with a camera placed at home to monitor the toddler movements and when child is present near a hazardous object the camera immediately detect the hazard and sends an instant alert to the parent’s mobile devices enabling immediate action and ensuring child safety. This application focus on leverages YOLO (You Only Look Once) for detecting the objects in single loop and OpenCV for real-time video processing. YOLO (You Only Look Once) incorporates robust and fast object detection ensuring identification of hazardous objects like knives, scissors, electrical wires, stair cases in a single loop. The project is executed in python with OpenCV integration that incorporates real-time video processing and hazard identification. This system demonstrates a significant improvement in detection accuracy and accurate response time compared to existing approaches. The project lays the foundation for the future advancements in child safety technologies by providing a robust, real-time solutions for hazard detection and prevention ensuring child is safe from hazard objects at home.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire Detection and Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207