MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413147816 · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2025.101291

Defining homologous recombination deficiency status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Clinical implications for evaluating response to platinum chemotherapy

2025· article· en· W4413147816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Resistance Updates · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong ProvinceGuangzhou Science and Technology Program key projectsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaHomologous recombinationChemotherapyMedicineOncologyAdenocarcinomaInternal medicinePancreatic cancerBiologyGeneticsCancerGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a daunting malignancy with limited therapeutic options; effective biomarkers are needed to improve its treatment decision-making. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in assessing the response to platinum chemotherapy in PDAC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 264 patients diagnosed with PDAC. Tumor tissue samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to assess DNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutation landscape and HRD score. The integrated HRD score was calculated as the unweighted sum of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transition (LST) scores. The associations between HRD status and clinical outcomes in patients receiving platinum treatment were systematically analyzed. Patients with BRCA1/2 biallelic loss-of-function (BILOF) status and/or an HRD score ≥ 42 were predefined as HRD-positive. According to this HRD status definition, 4.9 % (n = 13) of the 264 patients were identified as HRD-positive, identifying a broader population than using BRCA1/2 BILOF alone (1.9 %, n = 5). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations ( BRCA1/2 m ), presented a lower frequency of alteration in genes related to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and mismatch repair (MMR) genes than those with BRCA1/2 wild-type ( BRCA1/2 wt ), with mutations observed in 46.15 % (6/13) of BRCA1/2 m versus 72.91 % (183/251) of BRCA1/2 wt patients. The median HRD score (23) in patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene BILOF mutations was notably higher than that in those with non-BILOF mutations in DDR genes (9). HRD-positive patients demonstrated markedly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS 44.1 months) than HRD-negative patients (median PFS 12.2 months) when the patients received first-line platinum-based adjuvant treatment ( P = 0.035). Specifically, patients with BRCA1/2 BILOF exhibited a substantial clinical benefit from platinum therapy, with none of these patients experiencing disease progression or death during follow-up. BRCA1/2 BILOF plays a crucial role in identifying PDAC patients for first-line platinum-based adjuvant treatment, and HRD positive status, defined by BRCA1/2 BILOF and/or an HRD score ≥ 42, broadens the pool of eligible patients, and helps avoid ineffective treatment due to intrinsic drug resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.934

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it