MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413148358 · doi:10.18280/ts.4204045

A Novel Activity Pattern Recognition via Convolutional Neural Networks and Advanced Skeleton Models

2025· article· en· W4413148358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tanvir Fatima Naik Bukht, Naif S. Alshassabi, Haifa F. Alhasson, Bayan Alabdullah, Ahmad Jalal

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkSkeleton (computer programming)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is crucial to intelligent smart home systems.In this research, we propose a novel skeleton-based method for recognizing human activities accurately.Gamma correction is applied as a preprocessing step to improve image quality.Then, we use a robust combination of Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) and graph-based segmentation techniques to extract precise human silhouettes from video sequences.This research also introduces a novel innovation in developing a 23-joint skeleton model that accurately identifies and tracks key body joints.A comprehensive set of features extracted from this skeleton data is derived, including relative joint angles, joint proximity measures, joint stability, and full body features, which are extracted using BRIEF, LATCH, and MSER.A fuzzy optimization technique is employed to find the most discriminative features to optimize feature selection.Finally, a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) classifier is trained on the optimized features to classify human activities accurately.Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, with ShakeFive2 achieving an 88% accuracy rate and BIT-Interaction achieving 94% on a benchmark dataset.This work contributes to advancing human activity understanding in various domains, such as surveillance, human-behavior interaction, healthcare, sports, and social robotics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207