MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413155404 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2025.3596608

Analysis and Design of a Pipelined MASH Continuous-Time Delta-Sigma Modulator With 15.4 MHz-BW and 82.6 dB-SNDR

2025· article· en· W4413155404 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyu Qin, Yichen Jin, Mingqiang Guo, Guoxing Wang, Sai‐Weng Sin, Maurits Ortmanns, Yong Lian, Liang Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersShenzhen Science and Technology Innovation ProgramNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDelta-sigma modulationElectronic engineeringSigmaPhysicsElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design of a wideband pipelined multi-stage noise shaping (MASH) continuous time (CT) delta-sigma modulator (DSM). The quantization error of the overall$1^{\mathrm {st}}$-stage DSM is extracted as the input of the$2^{\mathrm {nd}}$stage, while the outputs of both stages are simply combined without using any digital filters. Overall, different shaping functions are generated for both QN without requiring any digital QN cancellation. Therefore, the pipelined MASH (PMASH) significantly mitigates QN leakage while retaining the decent loop stability of a traditional MASH. Additionally, several analyses have been made for the PMASH topology, e.g. the design guideline, the signal transfer function (STF), the robustness, etc. Clocked at 800MHz and enabling on-chip DAC calibration, the 65nm CMOS prototype with an exemplary 2-2 topology using multi-bit quantizers achieves 82.6 dB SNDR, 98.8 dB SFDR over 15.4 MHz BW at −0.5 dBFS 1.8 MHz input. The power consumption is 16.9 mW with 1.2V/1.5V supplies. It results in a competitive FoM${}_{\mathrm {S\vert SNDR}}$of 172.2 dB, while it avoids any off-chip calibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207