MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413184397 · doi:10.1093/plankt/fbaf032

Size and energy content of <i>Calanus</i> spp. copepods: linking copepod phenology to variability in their quality as prey

2025· article· en· W4413184397 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Helenius, Kevin A. Sorochan, Stéphane Plourde, Geneviève Perrin, Harvey J. Walsh, Christopher Orphanides, Catherine L. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plankton Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaBedford Institute of OceanographyDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopepodCalanusPredationCalanus finmarchicusPhenologyBiologyZooplanktonEcologyCrustaceanEnvironmental scienceFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Relating changes in lipid ecology of Calanus spp. copepods to temporal variation in their energy content is crucial for assessing energy that is available to zooplanktivores. In this study, statistical models were constructed to predict individual energy content from copepod prosome length and oil sac morphometrics, and ultimately characterize temporal changes in the energy content of Calanus finmarchicus stage C5 (Cfin5)and Calanus hyperboreus stage C4 and C5 copepodites. Direct measurements of individual energy content and lipid morphometrics were obtained for copepodites collected in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (sGSL), a foraging habitat of an endangered zooplanktivore, the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis, NARW), in summer 2019, early spring 2022 and late spring 2023. Estimates of individual energy content inferred from oil sac volume were comparable with direct energy measurements from the same collections. Inferred individual energy content increased as a function of prosome length but the relationship varied temporally, with 1.5–2-fold differences in energy content of average-sized copepodites, with ranges of ca. 6–9 J ind−1 in Cfin5 and ca. 9–15 J ind−1 and 33–65 J ind−1 in C. hyperboreus C4 and C5 respectively. Smaller lipid-poor Cfin5 were found in the upper 50 m of the water column in the sGSL. Regional comparisons were also made from Cfin5 collected from a NARW foraging area in the Nantucket Shoals (NShoals) in winter 2020, and with previously published observations in traditional foraging areas in the Gulf of Maine and western Scotian Shelf, to begin establishing potential upper and lower bounds of energy availability in known NARW foraging areas. In comparison to the sGSL, individuals in NShoals were relatively small and lipid-poor, indicating lower prey quality. Our results assess the extent to which Calanus species- and stage-specific lipid dynamics contribute to prey energy availability in important contemporary foraging areas for NARW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plankton ResearchSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207