MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413184403 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v8i1.62120

An improved bound on the number of point-surface incidences in three dimensions

2013· article· en· W4413184403 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joshua Zahl

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Defense Science and Engineering GraduateU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsPoint (geometry)Surface (topology)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that m points and n smooth algebraic surfaces of bounded degree in \RR3 satisfying suitable nondegeneracy conditions can have at most O(m2k3k−1n3k−33k−1+m+n) incidences, provided that any collection of k points has at most O(1) surfaces passing through all of them, for some k≥3. In the case where the surfaces are spheres and no three spheres meet in a common circle, this implies there are O((mn)3/4+m+n) point-sphere incidences. This is a slight improvement over the previous bound of O((mn)3/4β(m,n)+m+n) for β(m,n) an (explicit) very slowly growing function. We obtain this bound by using the discrete polynomial ham sandwich theorem to cut \RR3 into open cells adapted to the set of points, and within each cell of the decomposition we apply a Turan-type theorem to obtain crude control on the number of sphere-point incidences. We then perform a second polynomial ham sandwich decomposition on the irreducible components of the variety defined by the first decomposition. As an application, we obtain a new bound on the maximum number of unit distances amongst m points in \RR3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207