MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413191568 · doi:10.1063/5.0286742

Signature of coupling of potentials in non-linear energy harvesters with enhanced figure of merit

2025· article· en· W4413191568 on OpenAlexaff
K. B. ROY, Andreas Amann, Saibal Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
FundersScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsFigure of meritCoupling (piping)Energy (signal processing)Signature (topology)PhysicsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsMetallurgyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports electromagnetically transduced multistable non-linear vibrational energy harvesters to exploit the combined dynamical effects of monostable and bistable non-linear potential energies in a single system, by utilizing the stretching of specially designed cascaded tapered spring topology along with repulsive magnetic levitation. Using comprehensive (analytical and numerical) simulations and experimental validations, we reveal the signature of coupling and its key characteristics present in multimodal non-linear wideband energy harvesters. Here, a dynamical root-tracking technique is employed to trace stable, unstable, and hidden solution branches systematically, which enables predictive configuring of physical experimental parameters to realize previously inaccessible high response dynamical regimes along with a higher normalized power integral density metric. Thus, by tuning the powerful interplay between the numerical continuation framework and available physical parameters, we offer a robust technique for optimizing design and output performances in all such types of energy harvesting systems (independent of the scale and transduction) for their enhanced figure of merit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207