MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413192855 · doi:10.14740/jem1529

Craniopharyngiomas, Alterations of Melatonin Secretion and Their Implications: A Systematic Review

2025· article· en· W4413192855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Salvatore Gentile, Rossana Arianna, Mariarosaria Lavorgna, Alice L. Rodriguez, D Fontanelli, Mario Galiero, Fiammetta Romano, Domenico Serpico, Elisabetta Scarano, Carmine Dalia, Annamaria Colao, Carolina Di Somma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelatoninSecretionInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Craniopharyngiomas are rare sellar tumors that often cause hypothalamic dysfunction due to either their extension or treatment. This dysfunction can disrupt the suprachiasmatic nucleus and impair circadian rhythms like melatonin secretion, with potential effects on sleep, metabolism, and overall quality of life. Despite growing interest, the role of melatoninergic dysregulation in craniopharyngioma survivors remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review the current literature on melatonin secretion in both adult and pediatric craniopharyngioma patients, assess the risk of bias, evaluate the consistency of findings, estimate the certainty of current evidence, and discuss the clinical implications of melatonin alterations. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, using the electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search targeted studies evaluating melatonin secretion in adult and pediatric craniopharyngioma patients, with or without comparisons to healthy controls. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, Version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) tool, while the overall certainty of evidence was evaluated considering the risk of bias, consistency, directness, precision, and publication bias. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. All reported disrupted melatonin secretion in craniopharyngioma patients, though the patterns varied. Most showed reduced nighttime melatonin levels or altered secretion profiles, particularly regarding release onset and its peak. Significant correlations emerged between melatonin disruption and clinical outcomes such as higher body mass index (BMI), increased daytime sleepiness, poorer sleep quality, reduced physical activity, and altered circadian timing. The risk of bias was low in two studies and moderate to serious in the others, while the overall certainty of evidence was rated as moderate due to the small number of studies and their heterogeneity. Evidence suggests that melatonin secretion is frequently altered in craniopharyngioma survivors, potentially affecting sleep, metabolism, and psychological well-being. While findings are consistent, methodological differences and limited data reduce the certainty of evidence. Future research should prioritize standardized protocols, larger cohorts, and longitudinal designs to clarify the role of melatonin in various comorbidities and the potential of this hormone as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Melatonin may serve not only as a biomarker for hypothalamic injury but also as a possible adjunctive treatment in the context of a hormonal replacement therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207