The Role of Cooperatives in Fishermen's Empowerment for Sustainable Fisheries Development in Konawe Regency Southeast Sulawesi Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fishermen’s cooperatives play a pivotal role in empowering local fishing communities and advancing sustainable fisheries development. This study examines the contributions of cooperatives toward improving fishermen’s welfare and supporting the long-term sustainability of the fisheries sector in Konawe Regency.Using a qualitative research approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving cooperatives managing fishing facility assistance. The findings reveal that these cooperatives significantly contribute by providing access to production facilities, capital, skills development, and fishery product marketing. Furthermore, they serve as collaborative platforms that promote sustainable fishery resource management by encouraging the use of environmentally friendly fishing gear and overseeing responsible fishing practices.Despite these positive contributions, several challenges hinder the effectiveness of cooperative operations, including limited managerial capacity and restricted access to broader markets. To address these issues, robust support from the government and relevant stakeholders is critical.By strengthening the institutional and operational capacity of fishermen’s cooperatives, Konawe Regency can achieve sustainable fisheries development while ensuring meaningful improvements in the livelihoods of its fishing communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it