MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413207759 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555085

Observations of carbon radio recombination lines with the NenuFAR telescope

2025· article· en· W4413207759 on OpenAlexaff
Lucie Cros, A. Gusdorf, P. Salomé, S. V. Stepkin, P. Zarka, P. Salas, Alan Loh, P. Lesaffre, Jonathan Freundlich, F. Boulanger, A. Bracco, S. Corbel, Maryvonne Gérin, J. R. Goicoechea, I. A. Grenier, J.‐M. Grießmeier, Martin Houde, Oleksandr Konovalenko, Antoine Marchal, Alexandre Marcowith, Florent Mertens, F. Motte, M. Tagger, A. G. G. M. Tielens, G. Theureau, P. L. Tokarsky, O. M. Ulyanov, В. В. Захаренко

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité d'OrléansCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsCassiopeia ALOFARTelescopeRadio telescopeGalaxyAstronomySpectral lineLine (geometry)Supernova remnantVery-long-baseline interferometrySupernova

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Carbon radio recombination lines (CRRLs) at decametre wavelengths trace the diffuse phase of the interstellar medium (ISM) of the Galaxy. Observations of these lines allow for physical parameters of this phase to be measured. Aims. We observed CRRLs with the recently commissioned New Extension in Nançay Upgrading LOFAR (NenuFAR) telescope towards two of the brightest sources at low-frequency (10–85 MHz): Cassiopeia A and Cygnus A (hereafter, Cas A and Cyg A, respectively). We then measured the density, ne, and temperature, Te, of the electrons in line-of-sight clouds. Methods. We used NenuFAR’s beam-forming mode and integrated several tens of hours on each source. The nominal spectral resolution was 95.4 Hz. We developed a reduction pipeline primarily aimed at removing the radio frequency interference (RFI) contamination and correcting the baselines. We then performed a first fitting of the spectral lines observed in absorption associated with the line-of-sight clouds. Results. Cas A is the brightest source in the sky at low frequencies and represents an appropriate test bench for this new telescope. On this source, we detected 398 Cα lines between the principal quantum numbers n = 426 and n = 826. Cyg A is also a bright source, however, the Cα lines were observed to be fainter. We stacked the signal by groups of a few tens of lines to improve the quality of our fitting process. For both sources, we reached a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and spectral resolution than the most recent detections by the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR). The variation of the spectral line widths with the electronic quantum number provides constraints on the physical properties of the clouds: Te, ne, and the temperature, T0, of the radiation field, the mean turbulent velocity, νt, and the typical size of the cloud. Conclusions. Our final constraints differ from those inferred from LOFAR results, with ∼50% lower Te, ∼35% lower ne, and from 10 to 80% higher νt, on average. The NenuFAR observations sample a larger space volume than LOFAR’s towards the same sources due to the differences in instrumental beam sizes. These discrepancies highlight the sensitivity of low-frequency CRRLs as probes of the diffuse ISM, paving the way towards large area surveys of CRRLs in our Galaxy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→