MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine learning approaches for RCPT modeling of concrete

2025· article· en· W4413208059 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Naseri, Farzad Safi Jahanshahi, Amir H. Gandomi

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction and Building Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloride ion penetration can lead to the corrosion of embedded steel reinforcement in concrete and deteriorate its durability. One of the commonly used methods for determining the durability of concrete is the rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT). The accurate prediction of RCPT is essential in optimizing concrete mixture design. In this study, RCPT modeling was conducted using a dataset of 469 samples. The contributions of this study are to apply a large-scale dataset with essential variables, to identify the optimal variables to maximize the performance of RCPT prediction models, to determine the most accurate prediction method for RCPT prediction, and to introduce a novel algorithm to tune hyperparameters of machine learning methods. To this end, first, feature selection was implemented to select the optimal variables. Then, different machine learning methods were used to predict RCPT. A novel less-parameter algorithm (STML) was adjusted to tune hyperparameters considering multiple metrics, which was considerably more accurate than the conventional tuning method. The results suggested that eXtreme Gradient Boosting tuned by STML was the best-performing model, with an MAE of 38.893 coulombs. Subsequently, SHapley Additive exPlanation was synchronized with the best-performing model, and the results showed that the test temperature had the highest relative influence on RCPT, followed by fly ash to binder ratio, silica fume to cement ratio, and coarse aggregate content. Finally, the Partial Dependence Plots were applied to capture the influence direction of different variables on RCPT, allowing the identification of the optimal range of materials to minimize RCPT. • All the vital features to accurately predict RCPT are identified. • A novel less-parameter algorithm is developed to tune hyperparameters. • XGB tuned by STML is the best-performing model. • Test temperature has the highest relative influence on RCPT. • The optimal range of variables to minimize RCPT is determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstruction and Building MaterialsSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207