MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413211358 · doi:10.1080/14769948.2025.2535118

Black Jeremiads: Maria W. Miller Stewart’s Jeremiah Appropriation for Liberation

2025· article· en· W4413211358 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xenia Ling-Yee Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlack Theology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersForum for Theological ExplorationSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaLouisville Institute
KeywordsMillerAppropriationArtHumanitiesSociologyTheologyPhilosophyEpistemologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maria W. Miller Stewart, an African American abolitionist, moral reformer, and educator, has been called America's preeminent Black Woman Jeremiah. Attracting large crowds with her abolitionist speeches in the 1830s, her writings, sermons, and lectures were thick with knowledge of the scriptures, with her original thoughts and scriptural references nearly indistinguishable in her personification of a biblical prophet to her context. The question explored is to what degree Stewart's reception and appropriation of the book of Jeremiah influenced her effect as a Jeremiah in her own time. I argue Stewart demonstrated how the act of textual appropriation is central to the embodiment, experience, and liberation of her community and nation. Further, Stewart's textual appropriation – leading her to air numerous social and political grievances within and external to the African American community – laid the foundation for her rhetoric, providing agency for resistance for the African American community and other abolitionists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlack TheologySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207