MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413212708 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3595936

Resource Efficient Framework for Remote Sensing Visual Recognition

2025· article· en· W4413212708 on OpenAlexaff
Unse Fatima, Zafran Khan, Yechan Kim, Joonmo Kim, Witold Pedrycz, Moongu Jeon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsComputer scienceResource (disambiguation)Remote sensingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceGeologyComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the rapidly evolving field of remote sensing (RS), the need for efficient and accurate scene classification is paramount. RS imagery comprising satellite and aerial imagery often faces challenges such as varying scales and diverse environmental conditions, which can significantly affect the discernibility of important features. To address these challenges, this article introduces a lightweight dual-branch network architecture that adequately handles scale variations and complex scene compositions. The first branch, progressive feature processing branch (PFPB), of the proposed framework is engineered to extract rich multiple-scale features through collaborative parallel stages and intrabranch and interbranch connectivity with optimized computational resources. The second branch, InXformer branch (IXB) enhances the system’s capability to assimilate global context and long-range dependencies essential for comprehensive scene analysis utilizing an involution-based transformer approach. Experimental validation in three challenging datasets sourced from diverse aerial platforms demonstrates the greater effectiveness of the proposed network. The proposed network achieves a weighted${F}1$of 97.15% in the AIDERSv2 dataset, surpassing other methods such as DecoupleNet by more than 2%, while maintaining high efficiency with 0.41M parameters, lower computational overhead with 0.96 GFLOPs, and a higher processing speed of 4616 frames/s (FPS). With regards to WHU-RS19 and UCM datasets, the devised network achieves 93.69% and 94.57% weighted-${F}1$score, respectively. These results underscore the ability of the proposed network to efficiently handle diverse scene compositions by delivering state-of-the-art performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207