MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413220939 · doi:10.22260/ccc2025/0023

ZERO-SHOT OBJECT DETECTION AND SEGMENTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES THROUGH MULTI-MODEL INTEGRATION

2025· article· en· W4413220939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aoi Tarutani, Fuku Himuro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceZero (linguistics)SegmentationComputer visionObject detectionObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceImage segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Object detection and segmentation are crucial for managing construction sites, aiding in tasks such as progress tracking, material management, and safety assurance.However, conventional methods encounter persistent challenges, including occlusion, variable lighting conditions, and the labor-intensive nature of dataset creation, which limit their adaptability to dynamic construction environments.This study introduces a novel zero-shot object detection and segmentation framework designed specifically for construction-related objects, including machinery, workers, and materials.The proposed framework integrates three state-of-the-art models: Florence-2, Llama3.2-Vision, and the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2).Florence-2 generates region proposals for previously unseen objects using textual descriptions; Llama3.2-Visionpredicts and refines accurate labels for detected regions based on textual queries; and SAM2 produces high-precision segmentation masks.The effectiveness of this approach was validated through both qualitative and quantitative experiments.While parts of this framework and qualitative experiments were previously presented, this paper extends our previous work by providing a more detailed methodology and including additional quantitative experiments.Qualitative experiments using images from a specific tunnel excavation site, demonstrating robust detection and segmentation performance under challenging conditions such as occlusion and variable lighting.Quantitative experiments using the Alberta Construction Image Dataset (ACID) showed that the proposed multimodel method significantly outperformed Florence-2 alone, particularly for large objects, despite not achieving the accuracy of the fine-tuned YOLOv11 model.The proposed framework eliminates the need for extensive retraining and manual dataset creation by leveraging the complementary strengths of these models.This scalable and flexible solution offers practical applications in progress tracking, material management, and safety monitoring and thereby addresses the unique complexities of dynamic construction environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207