Well-posedness of Naiver–Stokes equations in logarithmic <i>Q</i> spaces covering $BMO^{-1}$ and its fractional counterpart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we introduce a new logarithmic Q -type space $Q_{\ln ,\lambda }^{p,l,k}(\mathbb R^{n})$ to study the well-posedness of the classical/fractional Naiver–Stokes equations. We show that $\nabla \cdot (Q_{\ln ,\lambda }^{p,l,k}(\mathbb R^{n}))^{n}$ covers the well-known critical spaces $BMO^{-1}(\mathbb R^{n}), Q_{\alpha }^{-1}(\mathbb R^{n})$ and $\mathcal {Q}_{0}^{-1}(\mathbb R^{n})$ for the classical Naiver–Stokes equations. Moreover, it covers the fractional counterparts $BMO^{-(2\beta -1)}(\mathbb R^{n}), Q_{\alpha }^{\beta ,-1}(\mathbb R^{n})$ and even the largest critical space $\dot {B}^{-(2\beta -1)}_{\infty ,\infty }(\mathbb R^{n}).$ In doing so, we first establish some basic properties of $Q_{\ln ,\lambda }^{p,l,k}(\mathbb {R}^{n}).$ Then, via the fractional heat semigroups, we characterize the extension of $Q_{\ln ,\lambda }^{p,l,k}(\mathbb R^{n})$ to $\mathscr H_{K_{\ln }^{(l,k)}}^{p,\lambda }(\mathbb R_+^{n+1})$ which is a function space related to the weight function $K_{\ln }^{(l,k)}(\cdot )$ . This extension provides a semigroup characterization of $Q_{\ln ,\lambda }^{p,l,k}(\mathbb R^{n})$ . With this in hand, we establish the well-posedness of mild solutions to fractional Naiver–Stokes equations and fractional magneto-hydrodynamic equations, respectively, with small data in $\nabla \cdot \left (Q_{\ln ,\frac {4(1-\beta )}{n}}^{2,k,l+2(1-\beta )}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\right )^{n}$ for $k\in \mathbb {N}$ and $l>n+2\beta -4.$
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".