MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413225639 · doi:10.3390/medicina61081441

The Effects of Pedaling-Based Progressive Resistance Training on Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function in Female Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4413225639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jungae An, Byoung‐Hee Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACRange of motionMedicineOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialRehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTotal knee arthroplastyArthroplastyMuscle strengthStrength trainingSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective solution for pain relief and functional recovery in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. However, stiffness of the knee, limited range of motion, and weakened muscle strength are challenges of postoperative rehabilitation. This study investigated the effects of a pedaling-based progressive resistance training (PPRT) program on range of motion, muscle strength, physical function, and gait in patients who had undergone TKA. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 female patients (aged 65–79) who underwent TKA participated in the study and were randomly assigned to either the PPRT group (n = 24) or the control group (n = 24). The PPRT group performed the training for 60 min per session, twice a day, five days a week, for four weeks. The primary outcomes were the muscle strength and range of motion (ROM) of the knee. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Results: There was a significant time × group interaction effect in all the quadriceps strength values (p < 0.05), with a moderate to large effect size (η2p = 0.142–0.390). The PPRT group showed a smaller decrease in knee flexor and extensor strength and a greater improvement in knee flexion range of motion compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The WOMAC index and TUG time were also significantly improved compared with the control group (p < 0.05). In the time × group interaction, a significant effect was shown in WOMAC pain, physical function, and total score (p < 0.05) with a moderate to large effect size (η2p = 0.099–0.196). TUG time also showed a significant time × group interaction (p < 0.05) with a moderating effect (η2p = 0.0840). Conclusions: This study suggests that pedaling-based progressive resistance training helps maintain knee flexor and extensor strength as well as improves range of motion and physical function in patients following TKA and can be proposed as effective training for post-TKA rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesFrench-language works237,207